Information pertaining to Manchester City’s compliance with Financial Fair Play regulations encompasses reports, analyses, and updates concerning the club’s financial conduct as assessed against established rules. This includes scrutiny of revenue generation, expenditure control, and adherence to budgetary limits as defined by governing bodies. A specific example involves media outlets publishing articles about alleged breaches of these regulations and the subsequent investigations or sanctions that may ensue.
The significance of these reports lies in their potential impact on the club’s reputation, competitive standing, and financial stability. Sustained non-compliance can lead to penalties ranging from fines and transfer restrictions to potential points deductions or even exclusion from competitions. Historically, examination of a club’s finances against predefined benchmarks has served as a means to promote fiscal responsibility and prevent anti-competitive practices within professional football.
Therefore, a structured examination of the allegations, investigations, legal proceedings, and eventual outcomes associated with the club’s financial dealings provides a comprehensive overview of this complex and evolving situation. The following sections will delve deeper into the timeline of events, the specific accusations levied against the club, and the ongoing ramifications of these matters.
1. Allegations
Allegations form the bedrock of scrutiny surrounding Manchester City’s financial dealings. These claims, often originating from media investigations, leaked documents, or rival clubs, directly fuel the ongoing narrative concerning the club’s adherence to Financial Fair Play regulations and contribute significantly to “manchester city ffp news.”
-
Inflated Sponsorship Deals
A frequent allegation revolves around the artificial inflation of sponsorship agreements, particularly those involving entities with close ties to the club’s ownership. The claim suggests that these inflated deals serve to circumvent FFP rules by artificially boosting revenue figures, thereby allowing for greater expenditure on player acquisitions and wages. Examples include allegations of backdated sponsorship deals. The implication is a deliberate manipulation of financial records to create a false impression of financial health.
-
Concealed Payments to Players and Staff
Another set of claims focuses on the alleged use of offshore accounts and undisclosed payments to players and staff to avoid declaration and taxation. This practice, if proven, would constitute a breach of FFP regulations by underreporting expenses. Evidence of such activity typically emerges through leaked documents and whistleblowers. The potential repercussions include fines, transfer bans, and reputational damage.
-
Misrepresentation of Financial Information
Allegations of misrepresentation extend to the manipulation of financial statements to conceal losses or inflate profits. This can involve creative accounting practices designed to present a more favorable financial picture to governing bodies. Examples might include the improper valuation of player assets or the delayed recognition of liabilities. The purpose is to create an impression of solvency and compliance, even when underlying financial realities differ significantly.
-
Circumvention of Third-Party Ownership Rules
While less prevalent in recent years, allegations have also surfaced concerning the circumvention of rules prohibiting third-party ownership of players. This involves complex financial arrangements designed to give external parties influence over player transfers and economic rights without formally acknowledging their ownership stake. These arrangements are intended to provide financial benefits to the club while avoiding scrutiny related to external control.
In totality, these allegations paint a picture of potential systemic efforts to circumvent Financial Fair Play regulations. The veracity and substantiation of these claims continue to be at the heart of much of the “manchester city ffp news,” driving investigations, legal challenges, and ultimately shaping the club’s reputation and future prospects. The specific evidence and legal interpretations surrounding these accusations remain central to determining the ultimate outcome.
2. Investigations
Official investigations serve as a pivotal component of the ongoing discourse surrounding Manchester City’s compliance with Financial Fair Play regulations. These formal inquiries, conducted by governing bodies, aim to ascertain the validity of allegations and determine whether the club has breached established rules. The findings of these investigations directly shape media coverage and public perception.
-
Initiation and Scope of Inquiries
Investigations are typically triggered by credible allegations, often stemming from leaked documents, whistleblowers, or thorough media scrutiny. The scope of these inquiries can encompass a wide range of financial activities, including sponsorship agreements, player transfers, and accounting practices. UEFA, the Premier League, and other regulatory bodies possess the authority to demand access to financial records, interview club officials, and scrutinize contractual arrangements. The initiation of an investigation itself generates significant “manchester city ffp news,” reflecting the gravity of the potential implications.
-
Evidence Gathering and Analysis
The investigative process involves the collection and analysis of substantial amounts of documentary evidence. This includes financial statements, contracts, internal communications, and transaction records. Experts in forensic accounting and financial regulations are often engaged to assess the data and identify any irregularities or inconsistencies. The complexity of modern financial transactions necessitates meticulous scrutiny to uncover any attempts to circumvent FFP rules. This process is central to substantiating or refuting claims of non-compliance.
-
Adjudication and Sanctions
Following the completion of an investigation, governing bodies will issue a formal judgment outlining their findings. If violations are confirmed, sanctions may be imposed. These sanctions can range from financial penalties and transfer restrictions to, in more severe cases, points deductions or even expulsion from competitions. The severity of the sanctions typically reflects the extent and nature of the breaches. Any imposition of sanctions invariably generates substantial “manchester city ffp news,” further impacting the club’s reputation and competitive standing.
-
Appeals and Legal Challenges
Clubs subject to sanctions have the right to appeal the decisions of governing bodies. These appeals are often pursued through independent arbitration panels or courts of law. The legal challenges can be protracted and complex, involving detailed arguments regarding the interpretation of FFP regulations and the admissibility of evidence. The outcome of these appeals has significant implications for the club’s future and continues to fuel “manchester city ffp news” as legal proceedings unfold.
In conclusion, investigations represent a critical juncture in the narrative surrounding Manchester City’s financial dealings. The process of inquiry, evidence gathering, adjudication, and potential appeals shapes the public understanding of the club’s compliance with FFP regulations. The outcomes of these investigations have far-reaching consequences, impacting not only the club itself but also the broader landscape of professional football.
3. Sanctions
Sanctions represent the tangible consequences imposed upon Manchester City should investigations definitively establish breaches of Financial Fair Play regulations. They are the punitive measures enacted by governing bodies to enforce financial integrity and deter future violations. The potential for, and imposition of, sanctions forms a critical component of related news.
-
Financial Penalties
Monetary fines are a common form of sanction levied against clubs found to be in violation of FFP regulations. The size of the fine is typically commensurate with the severity and extent of the breach. Financial penalties directly impact the club’s financial resources, potentially limiting their ability to invest in players or infrastructure. The announcement of a significant fine invariably becomes prominent news, attracting attention from media outlets, fans, and rival clubs.
-
Transfer Restrictions
Transfer restrictions limit a club’s ability to sign new players, either by imposing a complete ban on transfers for a specified period or by restricting the amount of money they can spend on new acquisitions. This type of sanction directly impacts a club’s competitive capabilities, hindering their ability to strengthen their squad. News of a transfer ban or spending cap can significantly alter a club’s strategic planning and influence player movements within the transfer market.
-
Points Deductions
In more severe cases, governing bodies may impose points deductions, which directly affect a club’s position in league standings. This sanction can have drastic consequences, potentially relegating a team from a higher division or preventing them from qualifying for lucrative European competitions. Points deductions generate considerable media coverage and fan outrage, further intensifying scrutiny of the club’s financial conduct.
-
Exclusion from Competitions
The most severe sanction is exclusion from prestigious competitions such as the Champions League or Europa League. This penalty not only results in a significant loss of revenue but also damages the club’s reputation and appeal to players. Exclusion from competitions has a devastating impact on a club’s prospects and triggers extensive news coverage, often leading to calls for resignations from club officials and widespread condemnation of their financial practices.
These sanctions, whether threatened or imposed, are central to news reports regarding Manchester City and FFP. The potential ramifications of these penalties amplify the importance of the investigations and legal challenges, ultimately shaping the narrative surrounding the club’s financial dealings and competitive future. The degree and nature of sanctions provide a tangible measure of the perceived severity of any FFP breaches.
4. Revenues
Revenues are a fundamental element in assessing a football club’s compliance with Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations; thus, they are inherently linked to related news. FFP seeks to ensure clubs operate sustainably by limiting expenditure to levels supportable by independently generated income. Therefore, the quantum and sources of revenue are subject to intense scrutiny. News reports invariably focus on whether a club’s reported revenue figures are genuine reflections of their commercial activities or have been artificially inflated to circumvent FFP rules. Instances of alleged inflated sponsorship deals or questionable related-party transactions involving entities linked to a club’s ownership directly influence related media.
The composition of revenue streams is also relevant. Matchday revenue, broadcasting rights, commercial sponsorships, and player sales constitute the primary sources. A club’s ability to generate substantial revenue from these diverse sources signals a healthy financial foundation, minimizing the risk of FFP breaches. Conversely, a heavy reliance on a single revenue stream, particularly if that stream is perceived as artificially inflated or unsustainable, raises red flags and attracts heightened media attention. The reporting surrounding Manchester City’s sponsorship agreements with Etihad Airways, for example, has frequently highlighted the close ties between the airline and the club’s ownership, raising questions about the arm’s-length nature of the deals and their compliance with FFP principles. Similarly, any substantial increase in revenue without a corresponding increase in on-field success or commercial appeal is likely to trigger scrutiny and increased visibility.
In conclusion, revenue generation is a cornerstone of FFP compliance, and consequently, its analysis is integral to understanding and interpreting related news. The sources, sustainability, and authenticity of revenue streams are key metrics scrutinized by governing bodies and media outlets alike. Any perceived irregularities or inconsistencies in revenue reporting inevitably become significant topics within the narrative surrounding a club’s adherence to FFP regulations. Ensuring revenue streams are diverse, verifiable, and proportional to commercial performance is crucial for maintaining financial stability and mitigating the risk of sanctions.
5. Expenditures
Expenditures constitute a core component of Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations, and as such, are inextricably linked to news pertaining to Manchester City’s compliance. FFP operates on the principle that a club’s spending must be aligned with its independently generated revenue, thereby promoting financial sustainability. Consequently, the nature and magnitude of Manchester City’s outlays are subject to scrutiny, impacting related media coverage and public perception. A primary focus lies on evaluating whether the club’s expenditure on player transfers, wages, and other operational costs remains within the permissible limits set by FFP. Allegations of excessive spending or attempts to circumvent these limits inevitably generate substantial media attention. A prominent example includes concerns surrounding the club’s player acquisition strategy, where significant investments in star players have raised questions about the sustainability of their wage bill and the overall financial health of the organization. The practical significance of understanding these expenditures lies in its ability to forecast the potential for FFP breaches and the subsequent imposition of sanctions.
Further analysis involves examining the specific categories of expenditures and their relative proportions. Player wages typically represent the largest expense for a football club. Therefore, scrutiny often centers on whether the club’s wage structure is sustainable given its revenue streams. Transfer fees, amortization costs, and agent fees also contribute significantly to overall expenditure. The accounting treatment of these expenses can be complex, and any perceived irregularities or attempts to manipulate these figures can trigger investigations and fuel news reports. For instance, questions regarding the valuation of player assets or the structuring of transfer deals to defer costs over extended periods can attract attention from regulatory bodies and the media. The ability to accurately assess and interpret a club’s expenditure patterns is crucial for stakeholders, including investors, fans, and competitors, to understand the club’s financial stability and competitive outlook.
In conclusion, expenditure patterns are central to the FFP narrative and significantly influence the tone and content of news related to Manchester City. Maintaining transparent and sustainable spending practices is essential for complying with FFP regulations and avoiding potential sanctions. The ability to dissect and interpret expenditure data is paramount for understanding a club’s financial health and predicting its long-term viability. Challenges arise in the complexity of football finance, requiring rigorous auditing and independent oversight to ensure transparency and compliance. Ultimately, the relationship between expenditures and FFP serves as a crucial indicator of a club’s financial responsibility and its adherence to the principles of fair competition.
6. Regulations
Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations are the codified standards and guidelines that govern the financial operations of football clubs, including Manchester City. Their relevance to news stems from their role in assessing compliance and imposing sanctions for breaches. These regulations define the boundaries within which clubs must operate, making them central to ongoing discussions and media coverage concerning the club’s financial activities.
-
Profitability and Sustainability Rules
These rules mandate that clubs must demonstrate a balance between income and expenditure over a defined monitoring period. Permissible deviations from break-even are strictly regulated, requiring clubs to cover any losses with owner equity injections within defined limits. For Manchester City, scrutiny often focuses on the sources and legitimacy of revenue declared to meet these requirements, with questions raised about potentially inflated sponsorship deals and related-party transactions. Breaches of these rules can lead to financial penalties, transfer restrictions, and even points deductions, directly impacting the club’s competitive standing.
-
Wage Cost Control Measures
FFP regulations also place constraints on a club’s wage bill, typically expressed as a percentage of revenue. The intent is to prevent unsustainable wage inflation that could destabilize a club’s finances. News surrounding Manchester City often touches on the substantial salaries paid to its star players and whether these wage costs align with the club’s revenue generation. Investigations may examine whether there have been undisclosed payments or attempts to circumvent wage restrictions through complex contractual arrangements.
-
Transfer Spending Limitations
While not explicitly capped, transfer spending is indirectly controlled through the profitability and sustainability rules. A club’s ability to invest heavily in player acquisitions is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient revenue to offset these costs. Media coverage frequently scrutinizes Manchester City’s transfer activity, particularly the sums spent on individual players, and assesses whether such spending is justifiable given the club’s financial performance. High-profile transfers can trigger inquiries into the club’s financial position and its compliance with FFP regulations.
-
Licensing and Monitoring Processes
FFP regulations are enforced through licensing requirements and ongoing monitoring processes conducted by governing bodies such as UEFA and the Premier League. Clubs must submit detailed financial information for review, and any discrepancies or suspected violations can trigger investigations. News often reports on these monitoring processes, including announcements of investigations, hearings, and rulings related to a club’s FFP compliance. The outcomes of these processes have significant consequences for the club’s participation in competitions and its overall reputation.
These regulations provide the framework for assessing financial conduct. The effectiveness of these regulations, and the transparency with which they are applied, continue to be subjects of intense debate. The consistent theme within news pertaining to Manchester City and FFP revolves around the application, interpretation, and enforcement of these established financial governance parameters.
7. Outcomes
The “outcomes” stemming from Financial Fair Play (FFP) investigations involving Manchester City directly shape related news. These results, whether favorable or unfavorable to the club, determine the trajectory of subsequent reporting and significantly impact public perception. Adverse outcomes, such as sanctions or adverse judgments, invariably generate substantial media coverage, often triggering further scrutiny of the club’s financial practices. For instance, a finding of guilt regarding inflated sponsorship deals would not only result in penalties but also fuel speculation about the extent of the alleged wrongdoing and the potential involvement of key personnel. These events amplify the importance of “outcomes” as a critical component of related news, serving as a catalyst for ongoing discussions and analyses.
Conversely, favorable outcomes, such as successful appeals or exonerations, can also generate extensive news, albeit with a different tone. A successful appeal against a UEFA ban, as witnessed in a prior instance involving Manchester City, leads to discussions about the legal arguments employed, the merits of the case, and the implications for future FFP enforcement. Such instances highlight the complex interplay between legal challenges and the ultimate determination of compliance. The practical significance of understanding these outcomes lies in their ability to provide closure, albeit often temporary, to ongoing controversies and to offer insights into the interpretation and enforcement of FFP regulations. The implications extend beyond the club itself, influencing the behavior of other clubs and shaping the future landscape of European football.
In summary, the outcomes of FFP proceedings involving Manchester City serve as pivotal moments that drive related news. These results, whether punitive or exculpatory, shape public perception, influence future investigations, and impact the enforcement of FFP regulations. Challenges remain in ensuring transparency and consistency in the application of these regulations, and the “outcomes” provide a crucial lens through which to assess the effectiveness of FFP in promoting financial stability and fair competition within professional football.
8. Appeals
Appeals represent a critical juncture in the narrative surrounding Manchester City’s compliance with Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations, generating significant related news. Following an adverse judgment or sanction imposed by a governing body, the club’s decision to appeal, or not, directly shapes the subsequent media coverage and public discourse. The legal grounds for appeal, the specific arguments presented, and the composition of the appellate body all become subjects of intense scrutiny. Instances of successful appeals, such as the overturning of UEFA’s initial Champions League ban, demonstrate the potential for legal challenges to alter the course of FFP enforcement and provide critical insights into the interpretation of regulations. Conversely, unsuccessful appeals tend to reinforce the original findings of non-compliance and often lead to further investigations or heightened scrutiny. The practical significance of understanding the appeals process lies in its ability to illuminate the complex legal and financial considerations underlying FFP disputes.
The appeals process introduces layers of complexity to situations, making it a pivotal element in the narrative. The legal arguments presented in appeals proceedings often involve intricate financial analyses, interpretations of contractual agreements, and challenges to the admissibility of evidence. Media coverage frequently dissects these arguments, providing the public with a glimpse into the technical aspects of FFP compliance. The composition of the appellate body whether it be an independent arbitration panel or a court of law can influence the perceived fairness and impartiality of the process. Furthermore, the timing and duration of appeals proceedings contribute to the sustained attention and scrutiny surrounding the club’s financial affairs. The specific outcomes of these appeals, whether upholding, modifying, or overturning the initial decision, have significant implications for the club’s reputation, competitive standing, and financial future.
In summary, appeals are an indispensable component of FFP-related coverage concerning Manchester City. They present opportunities for legal challenges, provide insights into the interpretation of financial regulations, and ultimately determine the fate of sanctions imposed. The intricacies of the appeals process, the legal arguments presented, and the eventual outcomes all contribute to the complexity and sustained interest in the matter. Effective analysis and understanding of this process is crucial for all stakeholders seeking to comprehend the evolving landscape of financial governance in professional football.
9. Impact
The consequences of Manchester City FFP-related news are multi-faceted, extending far beyond the immediate confines of the club. Potential sanctions, scrutiny, and outcomes directly affect the club’s competitive performance, financial standing, and brand reputation. For example, transfer bans restrict squad development, impacting on-field success and revenue streams derived from Champions League qualification and player sales. Financial penalties divert resources away from infrastructure investments or player acquisitions, potentially hindering long-term growth and competitiveness. A damaged brand reputation can affect sponsorship deals and commercial partnerships, further impacting revenue generation. The broader economic ecosystem surrounding the club, including local businesses and community initiatives, is also indirectly affected by the club’s financial stability and perceived integrity. These impacts, whether positive or negative, become inextricably linked to Manchester City FFP news, shaping the narrative and influencing public opinion.
The influence extends beyond the club itself, affecting the landscape of European football and setting precedents for FFP enforcement. Decisions made by governing bodies in response to alleged breaches send signals to other clubs regarding acceptable financial practices and the potential consequences of non-compliance. Disparities in the application or interpretation of FFP regulations can raise concerns about fairness and consistency, potentially undermining the credibility of the system. The impact on player transfer markets is also significant, as transfer restrictions or financial limitations imposed on a prominent club like Manchester City can alter player valuations and influence the flow of talent within the sport. Rival clubs may also strategically leverage FFP news to gain a competitive advantage, either by highlighting alleged breaches or by lobbying for stricter enforcement.
In summary, the impact stemming from Manchester City FFP-related news is far-reaching, impacting multiple stakeholders and shaping the broader context of financial regulation in football. The consequences, both direct and indirect, extend from the club’s competitive performance and financial stability to the integrity of FFP enforcement and the dynamics of the European football landscape. Understanding these impacts is essential for all stakeholders, including club officials, governing bodies, media outlets, and fans, to navigate the complex terrain of financial governance and promote fairness within the sport. Challenges persist in ensuring transparency, consistency, and equitable application of FFP rules to mitigate potential unintended consequences and foster long-term financial stability.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Manchester City and Financial Fair Play (FFP)
This section addresses frequently encountered questions related to Manchester City and Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations, providing concise and informative answers to clarify common misunderstandings and concerns.
Question 1: What are the core principles of Financial Fair Play regulations?
Financial Fair Play regulations fundamentally aim to promote financial sustainability among football clubs. These regulations seek to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means and accumulating unsustainable levels of debt. The core principles revolve around break-even requirements, wage cost control, and transparency in financial dealings.
Question 2: What specific allegations have been levied against Manchester City concerning FFP breaches?
Manchester City has faced allegations concerning the artificial inflation of sponsorship agreements, particularly those involving entities related to the club’s ownership. Further accusations include concealed payments to players and staff, misrepresentation of financial information, and circumvention of third-party ownership rules. The veracity of these claims has been subject to scrutiny and legal challenges.
Question 3: What potential sanctions could Manchester City face if found guilty of FFP violations?
Potential sanctions for FFP breaches range in severity. They include financial penalties, transfer restrictions limiting the ability to sign new players, points deductions affecting league standings, and, in extreme cases, exclusion from prestigious competitions such as the Champions League.
Question 4: What is the process for appealing an FFP ruling or sanction?
Clubs subject to FFP sanctions possess the right to appeal the decisions of governing bodies. Appeals are typically pursued through independent arbitration panels or courts of law. The legal challenges involve detailed arguments regarding the interpretation of FFP regulations and the admissibility of evidence.
Question 5: How do revenues factor into FFP compliance?
Revenues constitute a critical component of FFP assessments. The regulations emphasize the importance of clubs generating independent revenue streams to support their expenditures. Scrutiny focuses on the sources, sustainability, and authenticity of revenue, with concerns raised about artificially inflated sponsorship deals or questionable related-party transactions.
Question 6: How do expenditures factor into FFP compliance?
Expenditures are equally important in assessing FFP compliance. Regulations aim to ensure that clubs’ spending on player transfers, wages, and operational costs remains within permissible limits, aligned with their independently generated revenue. Excessive spending or attempts to circumvent these limits can trigger investigations and potential sanctions.
Understanding these key aspects of Manchester City and Financial Fair Play (FFP) facilitates a more informed assessment of the ongoing discourse and the potential consequences for the club and the broader landscape of European football.
The next section will discuss the future implications.
Navigating Manchester City FFP News
Understanding the complexities surrounding news related to Manchester City and Financial Fair Play (FFP) requires a discerning approach. This section offers guidance on critically evaluating such information, separating factual reporting from speculation, and identifying potential biases.
Tip 1: Discern Primary Sources: Prioritize information originating from official sources, such as governing bodies’ statements (UEFA, Premier League), legal documents (court filings, arbitration decisions), and verified press releases from Manchester City. These sources provide factual information, though potentially presented with a specific agenda.
Tip 2: Evaluate Journalistic Integrity: Assess the credibility of news outlets and journalists reporting on Manchester City FFP matters. Look for established publications with a track record of accurate reporting and unbiased analysis. Be cautious of tabloids or sources known for sensationalism or unsubstantiated claims.
Tip 3: Identify Conflicts of Interest: Be aware of potential conflicts of interest that may influence reporting. Media outlets with commercial ties to rival clubs, journalists known for strong personal opinions, or individuals with vested interests in the outcome of FFP proceedings may present biased information.
Tip 4: Analyze Legal Language: FFP-related news often involves complex legal terminology and financial jargon. Pay attention to the precise language used in legal documents and rulings. Avoid relying solely on simplified summaries that may distort the meaning or significance of key details. Consult legal experts or reputable financial analysts for clarification when necessary.
Tip 5: Cross-Reference Information: Compare information from multiple sources to identify areas of agreement and disagreement. Look for consistency in reporting across different outlets. Be skeptical of claims that are only reported by a single source, especially if that source is of questionable credibility.
Tip 6: Understand the Context: Consider the historical context of FFP regulations and previous cases involving other clubs. This broader perspective helps to understand the significance of specific allegations or rulings related to Manchester City and to assess the potential ramifications for the club and the sport as a whole.
Tip 7: Recognize Speculation vs. Fact: Differentiate between factual reporting and speculative analysis. News articles often include commentary, opinion pieces, and hypothetical scenarios. Focus on identifying the verifiable facts and separating them from subjective interpretations or predictions.
Following these tips enables a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding this information. This approach facilitates a critical assessment of information, promotes responsible consumption of news, and assists in forming objective conclusions regarding the matter.
Ultimately, a proactive approach to information consumption ensures well-informed understanding of this ongoing situation.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis has explored various facets of the Manchester City FFP news. This has encompassed allegations of financial impropriety, subsequent investigations by governing bodies, potential sanctions, scrutiny of revenue and expenditure practices, the applicable regulatory framework, and the outcomes of legal challenges and appeals. The impact of these developments on the club’s competitive standing, financial stability, and brand reputation has also been considered. The goal has been to provide a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing this complex situation.
The ongoing narrative surrounding “manchester city ffp news” underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in football finance. Continued vigilance and scrutiny are essential to upholding the integrity of Financial Fair Play regulations and promoting fair competition. Monitoring developments, legal proceedings, and outcomes associated with this case is critical for understanding the evolving landscape of financial governance in professional football.
